Progressive Racialism
Race, Gender and the Natural Order of Human Beings
If there were a book on the natural order of human beings, it would only have two chapters: race and gender. The first chapter would be on gender. In the natural order of human beings, gender comes before race. Gender differences are greater than racial differences. Human procreation is dependent upon gender, not race. Race is a product of gender. Race is diverse and ever changing; races come and go. Gender is binary, unchanging and predates mammals. To be a human being is to have a race and gender. Race and gender are the two irreducible foundations of human existence. They are not a choice, but inescapable, from the first moment of our creation.
Human beings have a right to protect the fundamental aspects of what it means to be a human being, and it is reasonable to marginalize threats to human existence. If a human being felt compelled to deceive other human beings about their true nature, about a fundamental aspect of their human identity, they are intentionally separating themselves from what it means to be a human being. Human beings have a positive self-concept and are not ashamed or confused about fundamental aspects of their evolved heritage. It is okay not to be a human being. No one can force you to be a human being. Being a human being is a choice. Rejecting your true nature is a choice, a choice not to be a human being. Progressive racialism is for human beings.
Progressive racialists accept that human beings are responsible for human beings. A human being who chooses not to be a human being is naturally free from the duties inherent in being a human being. Being a human being is a responsibility, not being a human being is a privilege. It is reasonable to assume that human beings know what is best for human beings because they are human beings, and those who are not human beings know what is best for those who are not human beings because they are not human beings. It is possible that human beings know what is best for those who are not human beings, or that those who are not human beings know what is best for human beings, but that seems less likely, and it does not follow. It follows that if it is inappropriate for human beings to rule over those who are not human beings, then it is inappropriate for those who are not human beings to rule over human beings. Human beings already have enough problems.
Perfection is a false idol. The quest for the superman is man making a false idol of man. Choosing transhumanism is choosing not to be a human being. There can never be a perfect human being. Human beings are inherently disordered because they exist outside of their original context, because they no longer evolve by natural selection. Some human beings are “structurally” disordered from the moment of their creation; some are not fully male, some are not fully female, some are partially both. Their disordering is not intentional. There is no genetic code trying to create human beings without a gender, or with a sterilizing paraphilia. There is no gay gene for a reason; sterilizing paraphilia is the opposite of what is intended.
There is evidence that a human being can lose what it means to be a human being, for example, by losing or not having a gender. Respect for dignity and agency means including those who reject their gender or do not believe in gender in the same category as those who lost or do not have a gender. There is no evidence that those who are not human beings can become human beings. Those without a gender are equal to those who reject gender.
It is reasonable to assume that those with a gender know what is best for those with a gender because they have a gender, and those who do not have a gender know what is best for those who do not have a gender because they do not have a gender. It is possible that those with a gender know what is best for those who do not have a gender, or that those who do not have a gender know what is best for those with a gender, but that seems less likely, and it does not follow. It follows that if it is inappropriate for those with a gender to rule over those who do not have a gender, then it is inappropriate for those who do not have a gender to rule over those who do have a gender. Human beings must retain the right to prevent human beings from losing their gender or their fertility against their will, which includes stopping the spread of sterilizing paraphilia, dangerous social contagions and harmful fads.
Disability and paraphilia trigger the disgust response in human beings. Those who had disgust survived to pass down their genes. The disgust response warns human beings about threats to their existence. You have no right to expect human beings to be more than their biology. There are two types of human beings: those who admit to having a disgust response and liars.
Free will is highly speculative. How would you convince me you were not being self-serving? It is not possible for a human being to prove to others that they have free will. You can only prove to yourself that you have free will. The proof of free will is that you feel shame. If you did not have free will, you would never feel guilty about your behaviour because you would know you are not responsible for your behaviour. Why would the lion feel shame for eating the lamb? It is because you know that you were free to choose and intentionally chose wrong (because of pride, spite, anger, jealousy, hatred, lust, etc) that you feel shame. You feel shame because you have free will.
Those with agency will not procreate. Getting pregnant and having offspring is deeply irrational, and all justifications are self-serving. Pregnancy is risky, disabling and can cause death. Infant offspring will always be a burden. Human existence is more important than a female’s rational desire, and it is encoded in our reproduction. They cannot escape it. It comes every month. It negatively affects their behaviour by making them moody and hyper-emotional to prime them for fertilizing. It makes them irrational. It is the human fertility cycle. The female gender is defined by its lack of freedom. They are not made for freedom, but for reproduction. Females need males to complete their cycle and to fulfill their purpose. Their purpose defines them. Reproduction is their destiny. They are free of needing to define a purpose for themselves, which is a type of freedom.
Female agency is not a trait that can be passed down (except through rape) because a female with agency will choose not to procreate. If females had agency, they would celebrate losing their fertility instead of experiencing deep trauma. It is likely that males only have enough agency for females to find them desirable (because they possess something they lack); otherwise, they as well would forgo procreation. It was not until recently in our existence that we became aware that males had any role in reproduction.
For males, the emphasis will always be on fertilization. Any purpose a male has beyond fertilization is a delusional vanity to justify false idols. Males protect females and females protect offspring is probably the most common false idol shared by human beings because it appears like a natural order. It is an ideal. We can tell it is not a natural order because it is not necessary for human existence, but it is probably necessary for human civilization. Those are two different things. Natural orders are not created by human beings but are revealed by nature and can be discovered. You cannot blame men for having false idols any more than you can blame women for only being able to make a false idol of themselves. Without egg-carrier solipsism, human beings would not exist. For males, love, commitment and loyalty will always be a choice. Males can give their lives for something beyond themselves. Females can only choose survival.
You cannot blame women for wanting the best seed any more than you can blame men for wanting to spread seed. You cannot blame women for having periodic fertility, meaning their mood and lust are fertility cycle dependent, just like you cannot blame men for having episodic fertility, meaning their lust is easily and episodically aroused. You cannot blame men for wanting to rape anymore than you can blame women for wanting to be raped. If males do not behave male and females do not behave female, human beings will cease to exist. You cannot blame human beings for being human beings, for being their race and their gender. You can blame them when they deprive another human being of their natural rights.
It is reasonable to assume that males know what is best for males because they are male, and that females know what is best for females because they are female. It is possible that males know what is best for females, or that females know what is best for males, but that seems less likely, and it does not follow. It follows that if it is inappropriate for males to rule over females, then it is inappropriate for females to rule over males.
Miscegenation (race mixing) triggers the disgust response in human beings. Miscegenation triggers disgust because being mixed-race is a disability. Is it an advantage not to look like either parent, or for the parent to have a child who does not look like them? It creates an identity crisis by not being a member of either the host or the guest race. They are even excluded from certain medical technologies, such as bone marrow treatments, like they are not even human. Mating is naturally more difficult since most prefer those who look similar to themselves. It is important to remember that lust reduces the disgust response, and the mixed race is a product of proximity and opportunity. It is also important to remember that you do not want to intentionally give your offspring a disability. The mixed race can be considered “transracial” in the sense that they are in transition between two common races.
Prior to globalization (Magellan’s circumnavigation) the mixed-race did not exist, which is why there are no mixed-race racial homelands. Human beings were confined to the geographic zones from which they evolved. Race is a product of geographic diversity, gender and time. Typically, the mixed race are human beings in the process of being harmlessly absorbed from a guest race into the host race. Racial absorption can become a racial genocide unless barriers are set up between the host and guest race. Those barriers are called race laws. While traditional racialists deserve appreciation and respect for how much they comprehended about race, even without understanding DNA and modern genetics, the one-drop rule is wrong, and it does not explain or help us to understand race on a human level.
Progressive racialists recognize the one-drop rule as a fallacy. One drop of foreign blood does not make you foreign. It does not even make you mixed race. Elizabeth Warren has one drop of non-white blood. Elizabeth Warren is white. Very white. Possibly peak white. So white that masking her with a traditional red race costume emphasizes her foreignness to a level worthy of mockery. What would happen if we allowed Elizabeth Warren to identify as a red-race human being? What would happen if red-race human beings only had to have as much red-race blood as Elizabeth Warren? That would be what a genocide of the red race would look like. How much foreign blood is required to make you foreign? The simple majority (greater than 50%) of your blood determines your race. The mixed-race has no majority blood of any common race. If your racial theory fails to explain the mixed race, it explains nothing and is not a racial theory.
The mixed race demonstrates how race manifests and how our creation works. You can mix common races. Only a common race can unmix the mixed race. Half your identity comes from your mother and half comes from your father. Race distorts that simple truth since most couples share race in common.
You only need a handful of males to transmit race. This is only possible because the male window for reproduction is open for far longer than the female. A few males can breed a great many females. What is the maximum number of offspring the average female would be capable of in a lifetime? A male could reasonably breed approximately seven hundred a year, which is only two a day. Imagine a few males of race alpha, but many females of race beta. The first generation would be mixed race, half alpha, half beta. Breed the first-generation females with their father's generation of males (the original generation). Their offspring would be three-quarters alpha. One-quarter beta. (Note: Adolph Hitler allowed one-quarter Jew, meaning three-quarters German, to serve in the military.) Breed the second-generation females with their grandfathers' generation (the original generation). Their offspring would be seven-eighths alpha. Great-grandfathers becoming fathers is within the realm of the possible for human beings, but not even necessary.
Progressive racialists reject racial purity as a myth. It is not that racially pure human beings do not exist; it is that you can only prove it with advanced technology, and it is a human truism that those who claim to be the most pure always end up having a drop of foreign blood. Tests are only necessary when the answer is in dispute. The difference between 7/8th and 8/8th is negligible for human beings because of natural human variation. It is not that human beings can not detect the difference, it is that I could create a test where I intentionally confound you by using typical human variation, meaning I only include the most 8/8th looking 7/8ths and the most 7/8th looking 8/8ths, with a few legitimate ones just to amplify the confounding. It would remain a fair test; you can either tell the difference or you cannot. An example of natural human variation is Elon Musk; many are convinced he has an East Asian (yellow race) ancestor. This demonstrates that 1/8th is the last reasonable measure that human beings should bother trying to discern. Meaning it takes up to a 1/8th variation to trigger your disgust response to the foreign, and therefore it seems reasonable to assume that an average human being could sort mixed human beings by variations of a 1/8th.
This is important for how we understand the human being. Human beings are a product of their parts. Who are their parts? We can reason that males carry the parts of their female ancestors, just as females carry the parts of their male ancestors, because you can have your mother's father's nose, for example. Not all parts can be expressed in a single human being. A human being should be considered as a product of their eight great-grandparents. It is easy for a human being to recognize all the ways they are not like their parents. It becomes difficult for a human being to recognize all the ways they are not like their grandparents. Once you get to your great-grandparents, all your ways will be accounted for. One of your traits will never not be there because it is not your trait. It is your race.
Race will always be of importance to human beings; it is fundamentally an expression of relationships, human relationships. A race is human beings who share a common genetic heritage, and not all human beings share the same common genetic heritage. The pre-modern definition excluded the word genetics. This is the same definition for family: A family is human beings who share a common genetic heritage. It is also the same definition for tribe and ethnicity. They share definitions because they are all related. They are an expression of the same thing: relatedness. It is also why I was able to claim that race is diverse, since every family could be considered a race. Because the words all share the same definition, they are naturally interchangeable. This is problematic. Thankfully, nature orders and helps define them for us. It is appropriately symmetrical that the natural order of race begins and ends with human beings: Human beings create families, families create tribes, tribes create ethnicity, and ethnicities create race, races create human beings. Family is defined by having offspring, not social constructs like marriage.
Fear not. You do not need to procreate to be a human being; you need to have a race and gender. Your race is your family. Do they not have the same definition? Not all human beings will or can procreate, including the best of us. Not all human beings are capable of procreation; all human beings are capable of racial consciousness. Progressive racialism asserts that the human being matters less than human beings. If a human being is greater than the sum of their parts, they are dependent upon those parts to be a human being. We are all a thread of a deeper, living cloth.
If race were a social construct, you could change it. The foundation of race is always biological. Race is a fundamental, irreducible element of human identity that can be measured and categorized biologically. To deny race's biological foundation is as absurd as denying its deeper, human meanings. Race is more than biology. Progressive racialists believe no one has the right to know your racial/genetic biology except the members of your race. Only members of your race have the right to determine ethnic boundaries. Meaning only whites have the right to decide what is a German, what is a Slav, etc…
A self-evident proof of race is the cross-race effect. It is common to hear human beings say, “All members of that race look the same to me.” Race hides ethnic differences. Human beings have a natural difficulty in recognizing ethnic differences within a foreign race. For example, members of the yellow race can recognize the difference between a Chinese, Korean or Japanese better than those not of their race. Not surprisingly, human beings find it easiest to recognize the people who are most related to them. Human beings are programmed for faces. Your mother's face is the god face, the first face, the face from which you judge all future faces.
Monoracialization (many races become one) is inevitable whenever multiple races of human beings are confined to a specific geographic area. The confined area can be a town, a province, a nation, a continent or even a planet. If you managed to monoracialize all human beings on the planet Earth into a single race, because of natural geographic and climatic barriers, the process would just begin again, duplicating many of the previous results, for example, regarding melanin. Human beings evolved for monoracial societies. Multiracialism (forced monoracialization) creates xenophobia (negative racism) and is deeply traumatizing for human beings. Multiracialism must be an opt-in experience.
Progressive racialists fully disavow racial supremacy. Racial supremacy is Jewish. Jews invented racial supremacy (a master race above all other races) when they claimed there is only one divine being who chose Jews above all others. They combined that with a concept called ethical monotheism. God is the source of all morality; therefore, those without god cannot be moral. Everything outside of their self-serving, special relationship with the divine was defined as being beneath dignity; the rest of “humanity” (goyim) were animals who had no morality and who could therefore be treated like animals, meaning they could be enslaved, robbed and murdered. To be fair, they did apply morality to other racially pure Jews, which was not nothing. It was later Zoroastrians and Christians who universalized and popularized ethical monotheism without racial supremacy. Judaism is a racist purity cult.
For progressive racialists, it is important to understand the difference between a concept like racial supremacy (which is Jewish) and white supremacy. Racial supremacy is a master race above all other races. “Race” supremacy is where the race is master over the race. White supremacy is a type of race supremacy. America was founded on white supremacy. Who is supreme? A king? An ideology? A religion? No! The whites were supreme. What about whites who believe they are the master race to rule over all other races? That concept would be expressed as (and notice the distinction) white racial supremacy. I have been using the term white as a placeholder for any other race, meaning black supremacy, yellow supremacy, etc., which is different from black racial supremacy, yellow racial supremacy, etc. Therefore, racial supremacy is inherently Jewish, and race supremacy is merely a form of government.
It is reasonable to assume that Jews know what is best for Jews because they are Jew and that non-Jews know what is best for non-Jews because they are non-Jew. It is possible that Jews know what is best for non-Jews, or that non-Jews know what is best for Jews, but that seems less likely, and it does not follow. It follows that if it is inappropriate for non-Jews to rule over Jews, then it is inappropriate for Jews to rule over non-Jews. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that whites know what is best for whites and blacks know what is best for blacks. Blacks deciding what is best for blacks is called black supremacy; it is a type of race supremacy.
Progressive racialism is proudly committed to ending racial parasitism. Parasitism is living or benefiting at the expense of another. A guest race that doesn’t prioritize the interests of the host race is, by definition, a parasite. The evidence of parasitism is typically a refusal to assimilate. Parasitism predicts extreme ethnocentrism. Why do Jews refuse to assimilate? Why do Jews refuse the melting pot? It becomes a selection pressure. The less ethnocentric Jew will assimilate, be absorbed and will become no longer Jew. Those who refuse assimilation, those with high ethnocentrism, over time, will only become more so. Parasitism is a problem greater than Jews, meaning all races are guilty. Jews are merely the most accused because they have adopted it as their main evolutionary survival strategy. It was inevitable that one race or ethnicity would adopt it, for human beings, it just happens to be Jews. Progressive racialism is inherently antisemitic because it claims Jews do not have the right to rule over or live at the expense of other races. No race has that right. That includes Jews. It will not be possible to target Jews specifically with law. It is not necessary; all share some culpability, not just Jews. All that is necessary are universal and egalitarian race laws that forbid racial parasitism:
NO RACE SHALL RULE OVER ANOTHER RACE
NO RACE SHALL LIVE AT THE EXPENSE OF ANOTHER RACE
Progressive racialism is indifferent to economics. Race predicts outcomes better than any economic model. Economic prosperity is less important than preserving race and gender. Human beings can exist without economic prosperity, but they cannot exist without race and gender.
White nationalists and radical feminists (radfems) are mirror-image opposites on race and gender. One believes in race but not gender, the other in gender but not race. Both are wrong. Race and gender are real.
Progressive racialism is inherently anti-feminist. Radfems are not feminists but gender supremacists. Gender supremacy is absurd; the key and the lock are both equally necessary to unlock the door. Neither can be better when both are necessary. Radfems fantasize about enslaving or annihilating all the lesser (beta) males and recreating the harem with only the best males shared among all females. Traditional feminists (tradfems) believe gender is a social construct designed to deny women free will, human agency, and enslave them to the home, the harem or the longhouse. They believe men and women are equal and fungible. They reject motherhood as oppression and view the family as a form of bondage. Both tradfems and radfems believe women have a special right to murder human beings because they believe birth makes someone a human being, not their race or gender. They celebrate the act of a mother murdering her offspring before natural birth as a symbol of their agency over their biological programming. Females who murder their own young are dysgenic, and dysgenic murderers should be sterilized. Tradfems correctly view radfems as biological determinists. Progressive racialism is a product of biological determinism.
Nations are relevant only insofar as they are a reflection of race or ethnicity, and not a purely social construct. Progressive racialists believe ethnic conflict can only be resolved with racial consciousness, separation or segregation. It is not possible for a human being to be equally related to all human beings. Human beings should amplify our preference for the familiar and disgust at the foreign with universal and egalitarian race laws to reduce conflict and prevent genocides. Preserving racial homelands protects our evolved inheritance. Race is derived from our natural evolution, is logical, self-evident and a reasonable boundary that all human beings can recognize. Racial homelands predate civilization. Race is a global phenomenon which will require a global solution. Progressive racialism is a globalist ideology.
The purpose of progressive racialism is to preserve the natural order of human beings.
Natural conservatism is a product of progressive racialism.